The iPhone4 not as good as you think

Just like every year at the same time, a new version of the hugely popular iPhone was recently released on the market. The iPhone4 boasts a whole new range of sexy features like video calling or multitasking and, like its previous versions, is meant to take the mobile world to a new age. But despite all the hype a closer look at the device shows that the iPhone4 is far from perfect. Some important aspects of the phones technical specs have clearly been overlooked by the general public and even though it remains a state-of-the-art device, the iPhone4, I have to say is not as good as you may think.

First of all, iPhone4 does not mean iPhone 4G! Apple has branded their phone in a way that suggests it has got 4th generation mobile broadband capabilities whereas it doesn’t. As far as I’m concerned, the upcoming HTC Evo is the only handset so far equipped with such a feature. But it doesn’t really matter anyway as here in the UK there are at the moment no 4G infrastructures.

Then comes the feature that should transform the way we communicate: video calling. Video calling effectively combines audio and video, and is indeed a step ahead of traditional phone usage. But this is no breakthrough. Six years ago, I was already using a phone (manufactured by Sharp at the time) that allowed me to talk and watch my interlocutor at the same time. But the video calling concept never really took off and fell into oblivion until now. However the main issue that resides in the iPhone4’s new feature is that it only works through the WiFi. In other words users need to be connected to a WiFi network to place video calls. And this goes without saying that the receiver must also possess a phone capable of interpreting and displaying the video signal.

This brings me to my third point: the iPhone4 WiFi capabilities. Apple’s handheld devices are not particularly renowned for embedding powerful WiFi aerials, be it the iPhones series or the iPad. The iPhone4 surely doesn’t escape the rule. Proof is Steve Jobs’ Keynote speech last April: his demo of the iPhone4 was plagued by slow WiFi connection issues.

And last but not least, many iPhone4 customers reported signal reception issues, depending on how they were holding the device. This is certainly bad press for the device, especially as there are no quick fixes for the problem. In response, Apple told its customers “not to hold the device the wrong way”. This was a bit uncalled-for and shows that Apple should definitely start thinking about doing some sort of user research.

In sum, the iPhone4 is definitely far from being the perfect next generation mobile device. But don’t get me wrong; the new iPhone is a nice piece of electronics and my intention was not to discard it. Yet it is still not as good as you think.

This post was originally posted by Xavier Klingenfus

Comments

  1. For such an important and influential firm, these iPhone discussions seem surprisingly uninformed.
    Apple have never claimed or called the phone 4g only 4, I agree it is slightly misleading but it’s far more useful for understanding iterations and upgrades, than droid x or htc evo.
    FaceTime works on wifi for the immediate future and has been limited by carriers not Apple. Interesting how they allowed on my old p990i yet not the iPhone, it’s as though the carriers were afraid people would actually use the iPhone!

    The antenna and signal are far superior to previous models as hsdpa has been improved, unfortunately holding the phone and short circuiting the antenna drops reception down to iPhone 3G quality. The camera is 5mp but just as with DSLR cameras the megapixel wars are over and it’s the sensor chip and features that matter. iPhone pioneered touch exposure and touch to focus, not to mention the 720p video capture.
    Thanks

    Neil
  2. [...] Pingback by iwolgca [...]

    The iPhone4 not as good as you think · Foviance | iPhone 4G Today
  3. Neil, thanks for your comment. I must say I find your introduction a bit harsh given that you provide additional explanation rather than refute the points. My goal was not to upset iPhone advocates but rather to clarify the way Apple has marketed its phone.

    Re: the naming, you’re right about the design iterations. However, there is no naming convention for the iPhone (e.g. the iPhone 3G was the second one), hence the potential caveat. Additionally, given Apple releases one phone a year, it wouldn’t have been difficult for consumers to understand a more standard name.

    Re: FaceTime, Apple’s campaign was based on the fact the new iPhone introduced a new way of communicating: via the video. The WiFi constraint set by the carriers is therefore a serious limitation of the feature.

    And re: the antenna, the iPhone4 was built using a new type of material to improve the signal reception. I therefore find it very ironic that consumers have flagged signal issues based on how they hold the device.

    Xavier Klingenfus

Add your comment