The experience of shopping with a tablet PC is much less satisfying than with your desktop computer. Although the iPad reinvented the tablet computer, unfortunately it appears that the actual surfing experience does not live up to expectations. In a survey of nearly 5,000 people undertaken by Foviance, a global Customer Experience consultancy, it’s clear that the customer experience of tablet computing is relatively poor – customers are up to 18% less happy with their tablet experience compared to their desktop PCs.

The study, which looked at what customers thought of customer experience in the retail, banking, travel and mobile phone markets in the 2nd Annual Customer Experience survey, commissioned by Foviance in association with Econsultancy.

Whilst companies are rushing to create apps on Apple, Android and Nokia stores it seems that they are not delivering for customers. The Apple store now has more than 200,000 apps, far more choice than the 40,000 products in a branch of Tesco but apps are not delivering the experience of their full-blown desktop cousins.

According to the survey, people are looking for efficient customer service (51%) and high-quality products (39%) at a low price (49%). Apps don’t appear to be robustly designed and have service issues. One customer, Muir MacDonald, explained that his new Skype app for iPad2 stopped working when he updated iTunes and he said “I delete a lot of apps that just don’t work as suppliers tend to ignore complaints and don’t fix them”.

Foviance also surveyed 650 companies and asked them about their commitment to customer experience. Only 10% felt that apps were ‘integrated’ with their overall customer experience, as compared to 48% with their website experience.

Companies are also failing to keep pace with the changes in technology. 40% of companies said that the major barrier to improving customer experience was ‘complexity of customer experience’.

Other findings:

1. In general, people seem to be fairly happy with their customer experience, for example, 87% of people thought their overall retailing experience was good or excellent
2. 69% of people will recommend a company based on a good customer experience
3. Customers are increasingly moving online, however, the face to face experience is still important, with the call centres and brochure being relegated to less important ways of buying
4. Mobile customer experiences are generally weaker – even if you’re a mobile phone company!

Download the report from the Foviance website

It’s an exciting development for businesses and brands; there’s a need to understand how customers feel towards products and services and even though Foviance has traditionally used research techniques to reveal conscious reactions, we are now able to unlock unconscious reactions with analysis of hidden reactions and impressions from customers using Emotional Engagement Measurement™.  This technique can boost revenues for our clients because they will understand on a greater level customers’ unconscious behaviours; it’s not just a case of knowing that experiences need to be optimised, but how to create better customer experiences and heighten engagement.

The importance that emotions play in a decision making process really cannot be ignored. By combining developed research techniques we can provide measurements in several key areas including; excitement, engagement, boredom and irritation (which provides a full picture of unconscious responses and reactions). It’s exciting for us to be able to provide the physical response to experiences, an area that was previously missing.

We have already witnessed great results for clear stimuli such as imagery, layouts, colours, email campaigns and more, which reveals entirely new levels of customer understanding.

To find out more about EEM™ and Emotional Engagement, please refer to our dedicated website

• How to use play to engage your audience and encourage sharing
• Case studies on good and bad efforts that make successful gamification
• The specific gamification potential for your product or service
• Practical tips on gaming mechanisms, designing solutions

The impact of poor experiences on customer attraction, retention and cross-buying has been well documented over the past decades. But today, more than ever, ‘Customer Experience’ has become the hot topic in business circles.

In a recent (June 2010) Foviance / Econsultancy survey, 92% of businesses said their organisation recognised a link between long-term business performance and customer experience – two thirds reporting a strong link . So what makes customer experience so relevant today?

To download the whitepaper a valid e-mail address is required, however Foviance will not contact you unless you specifically request it.

JUMP 2010 will focus on how we can make our marketing more effective by having a joined up approach.

Foviance’s Paul Blunden will be presenting research findings on the Multi-channel user experience.

Even if you’re not a Facebook addict or regular Twitter user, you’ll know how difficult it is to escape social media. Why? Because social media is revolutionising the way that people consume content.

Social media is opening new channels of communication between brands and customers and there is a lot of potential in the social web that marketers can tap into. For example, a study earlier in the year by Penn State University showed that 20% of all tweets mentioned a brand name. Sales and marketing professionals need to be aware of these significant media consumption trends so they can tailor and target their messages as effectively as possible across a changing landscape.

However, with all the hype around social media it can be difficult to understand where to start. So here is an outline plan of action to dip your toes into the world of social media:

• Set clear aims and objectives.
• Listen to the social world; understand what is going on out there and find out who your audience is.
• Use all the information you have at your fingertips to build up a picture of the social landscape.
• This information will show you how to work with your audience to achieve your goals.
• Then simply measure, refine, repeat.

More businesses should focus on developing social media campaigns relevant to their customers. The days of pure brand ‘broadcasting’ are long behind us. Successful campaigns are now being supported by an online social media component, or taking place exclusively in social media.

As you get to know more about your customers and their social media presence, you will develop a strategy that not only enables you to influence conversations about your brand and win more brand advocates, it will also recruit them as willing foot soldiers in your battle for brand supremacy.

Note: *A Report detailing this subject was written by Jonathan Culling and Billie Andersen for Evaluation Centre. To read this article please go to the crm software, contact centre software and marketing software section of the Evaluation Centre.

However, ‘internationalising’ a site is a far more involved process than merely translating it, and without intelligent international research with native users, it is not possible to truly localise a site.

Even the most well-intentioned business or brand will struggle to succeed in providing a good user experience online if it is not fully localised. Such companies shouldn’t be reticent getting outside help with localisation. Within Foviance we have many years of experience carrying out research internationally via our network of trusted partners.

Much of the international user research we have conducted has proven useful to businesses weighing up the decisions over their international strategy. For example, is it wise to launch a ‘skin’ (white-label) version of their brand? Is there a particular market gap not yet covered by competitors? Should they invest strongly in affiliate marketing and acquisition, or invest strongly in retention (some markets are more brand-promiscuous for particular products than others)? Should they simply hire a local partner to run their site for them? Taking the time to talk with end users in their own environment often reveals cultural idiosyncrasies that ultimately guide preferences, which in turn should drive those strategic decisions. This extra care, as well as making sure a site is fundamentally usable in a particular market, is pivotal to the success of an online brand attempting to compete abroad.

Often, usability issues you might never have thought of will surface through hands-on group sessions. Take for example some recent work we conducted with a client who is trading in several international markets. It provided perfect evidence for the ‘translation is short of localisation’ concept, when in a focus group session involving Spanish users we found a few of them trying to divide 24 by 7. Who would have thought that Spanish people wouldn’t know what was meant by 24/7? It took them a while to understand that customer service would be available to them 24 hours a day, 7 days a week – something that is pretty important.

One of the most interesting talks I attended during EGR Live (a conference and exhibition for the online gaming industry) saw CEOs of two South American online gaming companies explain how important it was to understand Latin American culture if you want to succeed in that market. Putting aside the obvious problems with the fact that it is illegal to gamble in those countries and you need to be prepared to pay a few people to let you make it happen, two secrets to wooing the typical South American punter are to watch the same evening soap as them and to send them rewards on their birthdays! In that part of the world, success is all about personal relationships, and appreciating that there are small local neighbourhoods and common languages, not just one common mother tongue.

There are numerous pitfalls to merely translating a site without carrying out local research in target countries. Such an approach is likely to compromise the customer experience altogether and send hordes of users elsewhere. Even translations within the same broad language can fail when there are fine peculiarities between regional versions and dialects that make all the difference. For example, some typical phrases in European Spanish like ‘Come and play’ simply don’t work in South American Spanish.

Foviance not only has a network of trusted partners upon which we rely upon to carry out research, we also have a great deal of experience in managing these projects. We’ve become highly skilled at consolidating findings and delivering international consistency in the research by wrapping it all up in a packaged solution. Ultimately their trust in our judgement enables our clients to make informed strategic decisions regarding the markets they want to trade in, as opposed to making language-based tactical changes to sites, forever based on intuition and doomed to a lukewarm effect.

This article was written as part of our February newsletter

• World’s first* neurological experiment into poor online customer experience proves existence of ‘web stress’
• Brain wave analysis indicates that consumers need to concentrate 50% more than normal when using a badly performing website
• Two most stressful points of the online sales cycle are search and checkout

* Based on extensive desk research in February 2010.

London, UK February 24, 2010 – CA, Inc. (NASDAQ: CA), the world’s leading independent IT management software company, today announced the first ever neurological study of consumer reactions to a poor online experience. The research proves that many consumers experience ‘web stress’ when trying to make an online purchase. The stress levels of volunteers who took part in the study rose significantly when they were confronted with a poor online shopping experience. In order to retain customers, attract new ones and prosper during the economic recovery, CA is calling for European businesses to focus on giving their customers the best possible online experience.

CA partnered with Foviance – a leading customer experience consultancy – to explore ‘web stress’ in relation to application performance, and its impact on consumer behaviour and buying habits. Brain wave analysis from the experiment revealed that participants had to concentrate up to 50% more when using badly performing websites, while facial muscle and behavioural analysis of the subjects also revealed greater agitation and stress in these periods.

During the study, volunteers were wired up to sophisticated neurological and physiological testing equipment, including an EEG (Electroencephalography) cap which was used to monitor brain wave activity. The volunteers then carried out a series of everyday online tasks such as finding and buying a laptop PC and travel insurance. Using all the data gathered, CA and Foviance identified the two most stressful points of the online sales cycle were search and checkout. At these two points, subjects experienced heightened levels of ‘web stress’. During the experiment, volunteers persevered and completed the purchase but in reality, more than three quarters of customers will abandon the site. The study also revealed that after a bout of heightened ‘web stress’, on average it took each participant up to a minute to return to a relaxed state.

“The results of this study sends out a clear message – businesses need to reduce ‘web stress’ and improve the online experience of their customers if they’re going to maximise returns from their web channel,” said Kobi Korsah, Director, EMEA Product Marketing at CA. “It’s not just about website design or internet connection speeds – the performance of a website is dependent on the performance of the web applications that support it. Businesses need an Application Performance Management (APM) solution which not only provides real insight into how customers are experiencing their web applications, but will proactively manage the performance and availability of these applications. This translates into better customer service, improved brand loyalty and increased sales.”

Catriona Campbell, leading behavioural psychologist, Director and Founder of Foviance, said: “Consumers have very high expectations of web applications and web sites – to be always available and instantly responsive. This experiment simulated the experience of underperforming web applications for our volunteers. The results show that when online expectations aren’t met, people quickly become agitated, confused and have to concentrate 50% more than normal. All these problems can be detected and prevented as long as businesses take a proactive approach to measuring the customer’s experience of web applications.”

The experiment builds on the CA 2009 Web Stress Index published last year which examined the frustrations associated with underperforming web applications. The research found that more than three quarters (77%) of European consumers blame either website owner or the website host (which is in any case chosen by the website owner) when an online application fails. It also revealed that if consumers encounter problems online, 40% will go to a rival website and 37% will abandon the transaction entirely. Only 18% said they would report a problem to a company, which means companies need to have their own measures in place to understand how their website is performing from the customer’s point of view.  

About the Experiment

Foviance carried out the study on behalf of CA at the labs of Glasgow Caledonian University in January 2010. Thirteen volunteers took part in the study – eight female and five male participants, aged between 22 and 42. The participants were from the UK, Italy, Spain, France, and Germany. During the study, volunteers were wired up to sophisticated neurological and physiological testing equipment, including an EEG (Electroencephalography) cap which was used to monitor brain wave activity. They then carried out a series of everyday online tasks such as finding and buying a laptop PC and travel insurance.

Download the study here

View video below: 2 minutes 34 seconds

www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmYSLWGYZzA

Press contacts

Catriona Campbell – Foviance  info@foviance.com +44 (0)845 054 6500

Press Coverage

Financial Times podcasts: ‘The stressful side of web surfing’ featuring Foviance founder Catriona Campbell

Using an EEG (Electroencephalography) cap and sophisticated neurological and physiological testing equipment, volunteers were wired up during the study and had their brain wave activity monitored. Everyday tasks online such as finding and buying items were tested by the volunteers.

The results revealed that search and checkout were the two most stressful points of everyday processes carried out online, resulting in the volunteers exhibiting a heightened level of ‘web stress’. This type of stress results in more than three quarters of customers abandoning websites before they have completed the task that drove them to the site in the first place. To download the whitepaper a valid e-mail address is required, however Foviance will not contact you unless you specifically request it.

Facebook turned six recently and celebrated the milestone by giving its homepage yet another makeover, this time to “improve navigation to and discovery of commonly used features”. Six years is a long time on the interweb but, even still, Facebook has made impressive and significant gains in that time. It currently sits at number four on the list of biggest names on the web (behind Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, respectively) and with over 350 million users (and growing fast) it is poised to very soon become number three. It’s become the “face”, as it were, of the social media space, if not the brain. Facebook is sitting on a veritable gold mine of highly detailed and often intensely personal information about its users; things they would never dream of telling anyone but their closest confidants, let alone a market researcher, making Facebook a veritable marketer’s wet dream. But much like war, “woah woah woah, what is it good for?” What do users actually “use” Facebook for?

Marketers claim to be reaping the benefits, as evidenced by the explosion of ads in Facebook recently, but is it to users’ benefit or their detriment? What are We getting out of the bargain? Is it enriching our lives or just making it easier to sell us stuff? Where social media succeeds over other media is by convincing its users to do the advertiser’s work for them. Every time we click a link or join a group, we might think we’re engaging in solidarity (support single sex marriage) or activism (RATM for Xmas No.1) or showing off our pop culture cred (Invader Zim), but what we are really doing is posting ads in our friends’ news feeds and sharing ads with them. As Facebook UK’s Commercial Director, Stephen Haines, puts it: [P]otential customers can directly engage with your business by clicking on the “Become a Fan” link or the “RSVP to this Event” link…this action automatically creates a story on the person’s profile page and possibly in their friends’ home page “Highlights”, generating free distribution for you.” Facebook “fan” pages are never going to replace a corporate presence on the web, but social media offers an interesting way for marketers to gather data on users’ opinions, behaviours and preferences by allowing them to consciously identify themselves with brands they like without ever feeling like a corporate stooge. And chances are they’re spending a flip of a lot more time on Facebook than they are on the corporate site. Marketers know this and they get it, but I’m not sure users do. The distinction for users is that they’re not part of a brand, they’re part of a community which identifies with that brand…but for all intents and purposes it’s an online focus group.

Similarly, market researchers are getting in on the action with Facebook Polling. Next time you click on one of those seemingly innoculous polls at your friend’s behest, thinking you’ll get to see how closely your opinion ranks against your cyber-buddies, you’ll effectively be clicking on a banner ad. You’ll also be giving the marketer who paid USD$50 to set it up the poll a candid view of your opinions, behaviours and preferences in context with the 99 other people who clicked it in your geographic region. Ray Pointer of Virtual Surveys told utalkmarketing.com: “These polls are clearly not going to replace U&A or ad-trackers, but they could spawn new ways of working. Traditionally, we have expected everything to be designed before the research begins, but often the basic assumptions were wrong.” Any one else reminded of the opening lines of HG Well’s War of the Worlds?

“No one would have believed in the last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.”

I wouldn’t go so far as admit to the intelligectual superiority of our marketing bretheren, but they sure are some clever people.